Georgia’s proposed Transparency of Foreign Influence Law has drawn significant international concern. In a joint statement to the OSCE, Ambassador Holland, representing the UK and Canada, urged the Georgian government to withdraw this controversial legislation, highlighting its potential threat to civil society and the country’s Euro-Atlantic aspirations.
Background Information
The proposed Transparency of Foreign Influence Law in Georgia mandates that any organization receiving more than 20% of its funding from foreign sources register as a “foreign agent.” Critics argue that this law resembles repressive legislation in Russia and could stifle civil society by stigmatizing and silencing NGOs and media outlets that rely on international funding.
Since the announcement of this law, protests have erupted in Tbilisi, with demonstrators voicing their opposition and advocating for Georgia’s democratic integrity and alignment with European values.
The Joint Statement
Ambassador Holland delivered a powerful statement on behalf of the UK and Canada, emphasizing their unwavering support for Georgia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. He condemned the proposed law, asserting that it undermines fundamental democratic principles and jeopardizes Georgia’s Euro-Atlantic trajectory.
Key Points from the Statement:
- Support for Georgia’s Sovereignty: The UK and Canada remain committed to defending Georgia’s sovereignty against external threats, particularly from Russia.
- Call for Withdrawal: Both countries urged the Georgian government to withdraw the law, highlighting its detrimental effects on civil society.
- Euro-Atlantic Aspirations: The statement reiterated support for Georgia’s aspirations to integrate with Euro-Atlantic institutions, as enshrined in the Georgian Constitution.
Government’s Stance and Response
Despite the international outcry, the Georgian government, led by Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze and the ruling Georgian Dream party, remains steadfast in its support for the law. The government argues that the legislation is essential for protecting national security and preventing foreign interference. However, this position has been met with significant backlash, both domestically and internationally.
On May 13, the Georgian Parliament pushed the bill through the Legal Committee in a mere 67 seconds, prompting violent clashes with protesters outside parliament. The swift and contentious passage of the bill has only intensified concerns about democratic backsliding in the country.
International Reactions and Concerns
The international community, particularly the UK and Canada, has expressed grave concerns about the implications of the Transparency of Foreign Influence Law. The joint statement to the OSCE underscores the potential harm to freedom of association, expression, and the right to privacy.
International Reactions:
- UK and Canada: Firm opposition to the law, emphasizing its threat to democratic principles.
- OSCE: Support for ODIHR’s (Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights) recent visit to Georgia and its ongoing efforts to monitor the situation.
Civil Society Impact
The proposed law could have far-reaching consequences for Georgia’s civil society. According to the Venice Commission, the legislation risks stigmatizing and silencing NGOs and media that receive even minimal foreign funding. This, in turn, could severely limit the ability of civil society to hold the government accountable and participate in public affairs.
Potential Impact of the Transparency Law
Impact Area |
Description |
|---|---|
| Freedom of Association | NGOs may face restrictions and stigmatization. |
| Freedom of Expression | Media outlets could be silenced or limited in their operations. |
| Right to Privacy | Increased scrutiny and potential invasion of privacy for organizations. |
| Public Participation | Reduced ability for civil society to engage in democratic processes. |
| Non-discrimination | Risk of discriminatory practices against organizations receiving foreign aid. |
Protests and Public Sentiment
The law has sparked widespread protests in Tbilisi, with citizens taking to the streets to voice their opposition. The demonstrators argue that the law represents a significant step backward for Georgia’s democratic progress and its aspirations to join the European Union and NATO.
The intensity of the protests reflects the strong public sentiment against the legislation. Videos of riot police dispersing protesters with water cannons, tear gas, and rubber bullets have drawn international attention and condemnation.
Time to Act
Georgia’s commitment to democratic values and Euro-Atlantic integration is at a crossroads. The international community, civil society, and Georgian citizens must continue to advocate for the protection of democratic principles and human rights.
By withdrawing the Transparency of Foreign Influence Law, Georgia can reaffirm its dedication to a prosperous, sovereign, and democratic future.
Final Thoughts
The proposed Transparency of Foreign Influence Law in Georgia is a contentious issue with significant implications for the country’s democratic trajectory and international relations. The joint statement by the UK and Canada to the OSCE highlights the profound concerns about the law’s potential impact on civil society and Georgia’s Euro-Atlantic aspirations.
As the Georgian government moves forward with this legislation, it faces increasing pressure from both domestic protests and international condemnation. The call for the law’s withdrawal underscores the need for Georgia to align its policies with democratic principles and its Euro-Atlantic goals.
Sources: THX News, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office & Neil Holland.
